Hello Betamax, Augment, not replace. It feels like leaders from every industry insist AI will be a helpful sidekick, not a threat to jobs. But the reality is much more brutal. Take Singapore's banking industry, as today's first Top Story dives into. DBS says it'll add 1,000 roles because of AI, yet it'll also cut 4,000 contract and temporary staff over the next three years. For the 4,000 people affected, augmentation won't feel much different from replacement. But experts stress that many banking jobs will evolve rather than vanish, since AI struggles with complex problem-solving and human connection. Perhaps the answer lies in upskilling, with banks like DBS, OCBC, and UOB rolling out training programs to help staff work alongside the very tools reshaping their jobs. Are these employees being upskilled to thrive alongside AI or trained to accelerate the demise of their own jobs? One hopes it's the former. The tension between augmentation and replacement is also featured in our second Top Story. An Insights writer shares how he walked away from his AI startup after seeing that its solution could augment a video game marketer's work but couldn't replace ad testing and media spend. AI may speed things up, but it can't always change what really drives the bottom line. Peter Cowan, engagement editor |